class: center, middle, inverse, title-slide # Monetary Policy Transmission Revisited ## RBNZ Roundtable ### Alex Li ### 18 November, 2019 --- class: inverse, center, middle # Economic Reality --- # Economic Reality ## NZ Wealth Distribution Source: Statistics New Zealand, Unit: .hi[1000 NZD], Year: .hi[2015] <center> <img src="figures/nz_distribution.png" width="400" height="450"> </center> --- # Economic Reality ## Household Balance Sheet __Differences__ across groups of agents or regions in __four aspects__: - .hi[Nominal-term assets/liability]: Short-term Deposits, Long-term Bonds, (Most) Mortgages... -- - .hi[Real-term assets/liability]: Stocks, Inflation-Indexed Government Bonds, Price-level Adjusted Mortgages.... -- - .hi[Unearned income]: Government Transfers, Pensions, Social Security, Unemployment benefits, Alimony, and Child Support... -- - .hi[Wage income]: Salaries, Bonuses, Wages, Commissions, and Tips... --- # Economic Reality ## Fiscal Policy New Zealand counts all public debt owed by .hi[all levels of government] in its national debt figure. (In millions) <center> <img src="figures/government_debt.png" width="750" height="350"> </center> --- # Economic Reality ## Consumer Confidence Index Confidence index fluctuates __across time__. <center> <img src="figures/confidence.png" width="750" height="350"> </center> --- # Economic Reality ## New Perspectives __Revisit the monetary transmission mechanism__ through the lens of Heterogeneous-agent New Keynesian .hi[(HANK)] models. -- - .hi[New Keynesian] models with .hi[extensions] on the household side. This is a rich environment where there are differences across the agents. -- - This type of models can incorporate the .hi[previously-mentioned economic reality] -- - It provides a more comprehensive framework for .hi[policy analysis and help inform forecasts]. --- # Economic Reality ## My Research - .hi[My research] explores the implication of .hi[bounded rationality] based on a HANK model. Households do not know how exactly the economy works. - The key difference is in the aspect of .hi[expectation formation]. - If the agents have __adaptive expectations__: Agent-based Computational economics (ACE) - If the agents have __rational expectations__: Dynamic Stochastic General Equilibrium (DSGE) --- class: inverse, center, middle # Transmission Mechanism Review --- # Transmission Mechanism Review ## Overview <center> <img src="figures/transmissions.jpg" width="800" height="550"> </center> --- # Transmission Mechanism Review ## Overview - Transmission mechanism from .hi-purple[monetary policy] to .hi[household consumption]. - Different __Channels__ for the transmission. - __Representative__ agents stories. - __Heterogeneous__ agents stories. - __Bounded Rationality__ Expectations. --- # Transmission Mechanism Review ## Direct v.s Indirect Effects -- ### .hi[Direct Effects]: - Effects that operate .hi-slate[without] change in household disposable .hi-slate[income]. - .hi-purple[Intertemporal Substitution Effect] - .hi-purple[Asset Revaluation Effect] -- ### .hi[Indirect Effects]: - Effects that arise from .hi-slate[changes in household disposable income]. - .hi-purple[Labor Income], .hi-purple[Fiscal Response], --- # Transmission Mechanism Review ## Consumption Channel <center> <img src="figures/diagram.png" width="700" height="500"> </center> --- # Transmission Mechanism Review ## Potential Topics There are a few potential topics HANK models can address -- - Stimulate the economy: .hi[Small Persistent OCR Cuts] v.s. .hi-turquoise[Large but Transitory Cuts] -- - .hi[Inflation-activity tradeoff] for the monetary authority depends on the .hi-turquoise[adjustment rule of fiscal policy]. -- - Well-speicified structural models can .hi[offer guidance] on .hi-turquoise[previously-unused] policy instruments. -- - .hi[Dual Mandate] acknowledge the impact monetary policy has on employment and economic activity through the .hi[labor market]. --- # Transmission Mechanism Review ## Literature <center> <img src="figures/main_lit.png" width="800" height="550"> </center> --- class: inverse, center, middle # Representative Agent --- # Representative Agent ## Definition A .hi[typical decision-maker] of a certain type (typical consume or firm). These models are .hi[easy to use]. The assumption is good when: - All agents of the same type are .hi-turquoise[identical]. - Agents' choices are .hi-turquoise[equivalent to the decision of one individual]. --- # Representative Agent ## Implications for Transmission - Households are .hi[permanent income consumers]. - Consumption .hi-turquoise[smoothing]. They are .hi-turquoise[not responsive] to transitory income changes. - The representative-agent models implies the .hi-turquoise[marginal propensity to consume (MPC) is low]. -- - Monetary transmission mechanism: .hi[the indirect effect is not important]. Households weakly respond to: - .hi-turquoise[Fiscal response]. - .hi-turquoise[Higher labor income]. --- # Representative Agent ## Implications for Transmission <center> <img src="figures/diagram_ra.png" width="800" height="500"> </center> --- # Representative Agent ## Comments on TANK - __Two-Agent New Keynesian (TANK)__ models are widely used to account for the hand-to-mouth households. - However, the distribution of wealth/income is __exogenously imposed__ by the modeler. <center> <img src="figures/giphy.gif" width="700" height="300"> </center> --- class: inverse, center, middle # Heterogeneous Agent --- # Heterogeneous Agent ## Definition Heterogeneous models contain __different economic agents__, which can be modeled in terms of - .hi[Idiosyncractic productivity] shocks: Wealth Distribution, Labor Income Distribution - .hi[Asset Portfolio]: Nominal/Real Assets, Long/Short-term Assets - .hi[Other ways to model heterogeneity...] HANK models usually assume .hi[incomplete markets] and .hi[binding borrowing constraint] --- # Heterogeneous Agent ## Implications for Transmission .hi-purple[Direct effects are not prominent]: - Generate a sizable fraction of (poor and wealthy) .hi[hand-to-mouth households] as in data. - These households are not responsive to interest rate cuts. -- - Households are .hi[no longer permanent-income] consumers. - Interest rate cuts lead to strong offsetting income effects on consumption. --- # Heterogeneous Agent ## Implications for Transmission .hi-purple[Indirect effects are prominent]: - Monetary policy is effective only to the extent that it generates a .hi[general equilibrium response] in household disposable income. - Higher __Labor Income__; - Higher __Government Net Transfers__; - Higher __Dividends__; - ... --- # Heterogeneous Agent ## Implications for Transmission <center> <img src="figures/diagram_ha.png" width="800" height="500"> </center> --- # Heterogeneous Agent ## Overall Response - The __overall response__ of aggregate consumption to a cut in interest rates may be .hi[larger or smaller] than in RANK models, depending on the .hi[fiscal reaction to the monetary expansion]. - Higher .hi-turquoise[Government Spending] - Higher .hi-turquoise[Transfer] - Lower .hi-turquoise[Taxation] - Lower .hi-purple[Government debt] --- # Heterogeneous Agent ## Policy Takeaway for RBNZ __Kaplan, Moll, and Violante (2018)__. .hi-purple[Fiscal reaction] to monetary expansion matters to the overall response of aggregate consumption. A combination of the following four can happen: -- - Study the Fiscal-Monetary Interactions in New Zealand - If the fiscal policy responds through changes in government debt, .hi[a rate cut is less potent]. - if the fiscal policy responds through changes in government spending, debt, transfers, taxation, .hi[a rate cut is more potent]. --- # Heterogeneous Agent ## Policy Takeaway for RBNZ Monetary policy designs to improve the potency of monetary effects? __Kaplan, Moll, and Violante (2018)__ A .hi[transitory large] change in interest is .hi-purple[more potent] than a .hi[persistent small] change, __given the accumulative changes are the same__. -- - When shocks are persistent and small, a large portion of the interest rate cut, and the associated relaxation of the government budget constraint and increase of labor income, __happen in the future__. -- - Hand-to-mouth households __do not respond__ much to future changes. --- # Heterogeneous Agent ## Policy Takeaway for RBNZ __Auclert (2019)__ offers a decomposition method for the monetary transmission mechanism. A monetary shock triggers the following things to change. Each household has .hi[different exposures] to each of the following change -- - .hi[Nominal prices] rise. - .hi[Real discount rates] rise. - .hi[Unearned and earned income] rise. --- # Heterogeneous Agent ## Policy Takeaway for RBNZ - Joint consumption, income and asset __data__. - A better empirical understanding of __household balance sheet__. - Better understanding the __winners and losers__ from interest rate changes. --- class: inverse, center, middle # Bounded Rationality --- # Bounded Rationality ## Rational Expectations Heterogeneous-agent models are solved under __rational expectations__. They make the following strong assumptions. Agents know: - .hi[Structure of the economy]. - .hi[Current distribution] of wealth, labor productivity, and other individual states. - .hi[How distribution evolves] across time and affects the interest rate and wage. --- # Bounded Rationality ## Concept HANK with Local Rationality by Li (2019) - .hi[Local rationality] is a novel bounded rationality concept developed by Evans, Li, and McGough (2019) - Agents are locally rational in the sense that they make .hi[optimal decisions] .hi-purple[without any OCR changes]. - Agents learn from their past experience to respond to .hi-purple[OCR changes]. --- # Bounded Rationality ## Model - To accommodate __aggregate shocks__, agents .hi[estimate econometric models to forecast] .hi-purple[future states] and make choices which are optimal up to their forecasts. - Both __households and firms__ need to make forecasts about the future to make decisions about today. - __Households__ decision on consumption: Marginal utilities from consumption - __Firms__ decision on price: Inflation --- # Bounded Rationality ## Impulse Response Functions .hi[Monetary Policy: 25 basis points increase] <div class="col2"> .hi-purple[Consumption] <center> <img src="figures/consumption.png" width="400" height="300"> </center> .hi-purple[Inflation] <center> <img src="figures/inflation.png" width="410" height="308"> </center> </div> --- # Bounded Rationality ## Impulse Response Functions .hi[Monetary Policy: 25 basis points increase] <div class="col2"> .hi-purple[Wage] <center> <img src="figures/wage.png" width="400" height="300"> </center> .hi-purple[Gini Index (Inequality)] <center> <img src="figures/gini.png" width="400" height="300"> </center> </div> --- # Bounded Rationality ## Policy Implication - Expectation adjustments .hi[across households]. Consider a simple setting: - .hi[Asset-poor households] are more sensitive to the labor income change. Higher expectation adjustment - .hi[Asset-wealthy households] are more sensitive to interest rate change. --- class: inverse, center, middle # Thank You! --- exclude: true